Thursday, September 02, 2004

Urban Income Distribution

The Brookings Institution published a report studying urban income dynamics since about 1980. The main findings were

  • A disproportionate number of large-city households occupy the bottom tiers of the national income distribution. One-fourth of households in the 100 largest cities have incomes that, adjusted for regional cost-of-living differences, put them in the bottom fifth of households nationally. By contrast, only one-sixth of large-city households inhabit the nation's top income quintile.

  • The 100 largest cities exhibit six basic household income distribution patterns. Only 13 balanced cities such as Indianapolis mirror the nation's income distribution. Similarly, in just a handful of divided cities, including Washington, D.C., does the number of households at the extremes of the distribution exceed that in the middle. Wealthy households predominate in a few large, suburban-like higher-end cities such as Scottsdale. A larger set of middle-class cities like Colorado Springs have most of their households in the central portions of the distribution. Finally, in low-moderate cities like Memphis, the number of households declines as one moves up the income ladder, but not as steeply as in stressed cities like Cleveland, where households near the bottom outnumber those near the top by at least two to one.

  • The proportion of households with high incomes declined in 79 of the 100 largest cities between 1979 and 1999. Struggling cities in the Northeast and Rust Belt lost high-income households more rapidly than other income groups over the 20-year period, contributing to a proliferation of stressed cities. Meanwhile, the middle-income segment shrank in some of the largest cities even as it grew rapidly in mid-sized cities such as Grand Rapids, Tacoma, and St. Petersburg. Overall, the number of middle-class cities grew from just 13 in 1979 to 29 in 1999.

  • Suburbs' income distribution inverts cities', as more than 25 percent of suburban households occupy the highest-income quintile. Yet the suburbs of the 100 largest cities contain a greater mix of households by income today than in 1979; the relative numbers of high-income households in suburbs declined, while those of low-income and lower-middle-income households rose.

Middle-class households did not abandon all cities over the past 20 years. Still, the majority of cities lack the nation's broad spectrum of incomes. Because a balanced income profile can create better social, fiscal, and political outcomes for places, cities should aim to attract and retain the particular types of households that would contribute to greater income diversity.

The report itself is available in pdf format.


At 8:44 PM, Blogger Jesus Henry Christos said...

dear torless,

great to have you back and have you post on something that is not an nyt's article (although i suspect you ended up at his report via the gray (grey?) lady).

that being said, if you ever try to goat-fuck this blog again via that insane formatting i will shank your ass. edit in html mode.

carry on,

At 3:31 PM, Blogger torless said...

Sadly, or perhaps not, it wasn't the NYTimes who directed me. I do occasionally read nonNYT publications. Who is grey? btw? Is that like Deep Throat? Maybe you mean Maureen Dowd? My current opinion on her is that she is repetitive, and vapid.

At 3:54 PM, Blogger Jesus Henry Christos said...

"the gray lady" is the nyt's nickname.

i thought "repetative and vapid" was how you liked your women, no?

At 4:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, that's just how he likes his friends.

At 9:35 PM, Blogger Jesus Henry Christos said...

well played old chum. well played.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home